Originally posted on Boricuan Bookworms
Happy reading!
I write dystopian novels. I write
dystopian novels with romance. Does
that make you cringe or make you smile? I’ve heard a million opinions on the
matter, some who say dystopian novels should be completely free of romance,
because “Who’s thinking about love when the world is crumbling around them?”
Others say romance is important in all settings: it’s what gives people hope,
something to live for, and perhaps something to die for.
In the explosion of dystopian
novels, we’ve seen all kinds of romance. Some series, like Chaos Walking and
Gone, have just a touch of romance set amongst harsh worlds where people do
terrible things. But romance is far from the focal point. Others, like Delirium
and Matched, put romance and love triangles at the forefront of the story,
making it every bit as important and captivating as the plot and world
building. All four of these series are popular. So which authors made the right
decisions? Or did they all choose right, in their own way?
Well, I’m sort of in the middle,
which I’ve tried to reflect in my combined Dwellers/Country Saga (7 books,
starting with The Moon Dwellers and Fire Country in each series). I personally
believe that humans will find a way to love, even in the darkest, most corrupt
worlds, but that doesn’t mean they’ll obsess over “the way the sun hits Simon’s
sparkling blue eyes even as he swings his sword at the demon-zombie.” I believe
there has to be a balance and that the “romance” needs to take a back seat to
the more important aspects of dystopian novels.
So what are those aspects? In my
opinion, dystopia should be more focused on 1) world building, 2) plot, 3)
character development (villains in particular), and 4) twists. Those are the
elements, which, if done well, make for a good dystopian novel. So that’s what
I focus on in my dystopian novels. However, I do include a touch of romance in
each of my novels, because, well, because my characters are only human and they
have the need to be close to others, to care, to grab hold of their feelings
and clutch them to their chests and never—not ever—let go. They fight for those
they love. Love gives them purpose, gives them strength, and sometimes, gives
them terrible sorrow.
For me the key is realism. The love
should feel real, natural, not forced, not included just for the sake of
including romance. That either means it needs to develop slowly over time, or
be there from the start because the characters have a long and powerful
history. In Fire Country, for example, the protagonist, Siena, and her best
friend, Circ, have known each other their whole lives. Although they aren’t
been romantically involved at the beginning of the novel, their bond and
connection has been growing for years. It’s time to take the next step...but
only after they go through the harsh trials that their world requires. But…and
this is a big BUT…the romance NEVER gets in the way of the story, never BECOMES
the story, never takes precedent over building the world. It simply exists
amongst the threads of the story’s fabric. And for me that’s what makes it
real.
Am I right? Am I wrong? Probably
neither. I’m just one opinion amongst thousands. So what’s your opinion? Do you
love romance in dystopian novels? Hate it? Are you indifferent? I’d love to
hear your thoughts by commenting below, and I hope you enjoy my dystopian
novels as much as your other favorites!
Happy reading!
